In order to compel compliance, what may the director apply for?

The director's ability to compel compliance involves seeking judicial intervention through a court order from the common pleas court. This option is correct because, in many regulatory environments, including Ohio's, when other compliance efforts fail, a director can resort to the authority of the judiciary to enforce regulations effectively.

Court orders can compel individuals or entities to comply with specific legal obligations, such as fulfilling licensing requirements or adhering to statutory regulations. This leverages the power of the judicial system to ensure that laws and regulations are followed, providing a tangible course of action when administrative measures are insufficient.

In contrast, a ruling from an administrative board may involve recommendations but does not have the same weight as a court order for mandatory compliance. Seeking financial compensation from a licensee does not directly compel adherence to regulatory standards and would typically involve civil actions rather than compliance enforcement. A detention warrant pertains to criminal matters and would not be relevant in regulatory compliance contexts, which focus on civil enforcement of laws and rules.